2026 # 3 (77)
Mamechkov S.G.
Literary Norm at the Turn of the 18th–19th Centuries in the Field of Monosyllabic and Two-Syllabic Endings of the Instrumental Singular Case: Prose by A.S. Shishkov, N.M. Karamzin, I.A. Krylov
Abstract
The article deals with the distribution of monosyllabic and two-syllabic endings of Instrumental singular case in the prose works of three authors who are significant for characterizing the norm of the literary language of the late 18th – early 19th centuries: N.M. Karamzin, A.S. Shishkov, I.A. Krylov. It is found that, despite the genre differences of the studied texts and the fundamentally different theoretical attitudes of their authors towards the norms of literary language, in the use of two-syllabic vs monosyllabic endings in the Instrumental case their norm is basically the same: two-syllabic endings significantly predominate in all positions, with a sporadic penetration of monosyllabic (colloquial) variants without their special distribution. The monosyllabic ending of 3rd declension nouns -ью is encountered somewhat more often than the ending -ой(-ей), and in some positions in Shishkov’s prose such forms are even more common than in Karamzin’s. The special distribution of monosyllabic and two-syllabic endings of the Instrumental singular case will subsequently be received only in Pushkin’s fiction.
Key words
two-syllabic and monosyllabic endings of the Instrumental singular case, Karamzin’s prose, Shishkov’s prose, language of Krylov’s prose